https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346781 The Court dismissed the Writ Petition challenging the classification of services under Works Contract Service, emphasizing the availability of an alternate remedy through an appeal to the Tribunal. The Court reiterated that the nature of the contract as composite or separate is a mixed question of fact and law to be determined by the Tribunal, not in a Writ Petition. The Court highlighted the conflicting positions of the parties on the nature of the transactions and directed the petitioner to pursue the appellate remedy for resolution. en-us Wed, 16 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 28 Mar 2018 10:54:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346781 The Court dismissed the Writ Petition challenging the classification of services under Works Contract Service, emphasizing the availability of an alternate remedy through an appeal to the Tribunal. The Court reiterated that the nature of the contract as composite or separate is a mixed question of fact and law to be determined by the Tribunal, not in a Writ Petition. The Court highlighted the conflicting positions of the parties on the nature of the transactions and directed the petitioner to pursue the appellate remedy for resolution. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 16 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346781