https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346781 A writ challenge to a tax assessment was held inappropriate where the dispute turned on whether contracts were composite and on the correctness of valuation, both of which required appreciation of mixed questions of fact and law. The HC held that such issues are not suitable for adjudication under Article 226 when an effective statutory appellate remedy exists. The petition was therefore not maintainable, and the assessee was directed to pursue the appellate forum. en-us Wed, 16 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 28 Mar 2018 10:54:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346781 A writ challenge to a tax assessment was held inappropriate where the dispute turned on whether contracts were composite and on the correctness of valuation, both of which required appreciation of mixed questions of fact and law. The HC held that such issues are not suitable for adjudication under Article 226 when an effective statutory appellate remedy exists. The petition was therefore not maintainable, and the assessee was directed to pursue the appellate forum. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 16 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346781