https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346768 The Court, after considering the Department's explanation for the 502-day delay in filing the Tax Appeal against the CESTAT judgment, found the delay justified due to the bona fide pursuit of legal remedies. Condoning the delay, the Court ruled in favor of the Commissioner of Customs, Kandla, allowing the appeal. The Court acknowledged the Department's efforts in following proper legal procedures, leading to the favorable outcome for the applicant. en-us Wed, 01 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 23 Aug 2017 07:32:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346768 The Court, after considering the Department's explanation for the 502-day delay in filing the Tax Appeal against the CESTAT judgment, found the delay justified due to the bona fide pursuit of legal remedies. Condoning the delay, the Court ruled in favor of the Commissioner of Customs, Kandla, allowing the appeal. The Court acknowledged the Department's efforts in following proper legal procedures, leading to the favorable outcome for the applicant. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 01 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346768