<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 814 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346756</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court treated the Special Leave Petitions as academic in view of the final duty notification and subsequent review proceedings, and disposed of them on that basis. The Court did not decide whether the meaning of &quot;domestic industry&quot; under Rule 2(b) of the Anti-Dumping Rules required adjudication in those petitions, and it expressly left that question open for decision in an appropriate case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2017 18:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=486449" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 814 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346756</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court treated the Special Leave Petitions as academic in view of the final duty notification and subsequent review proceedings, and disposed of them on that basis. The Court did not decide whether the meaning of &quot;domestic industry&quot; under Rule 2(b) of the Anti-Dumping Rules required adjudication in those petitions, and it expressly left that question open for decision in an appropriate case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346756</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>