<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 814 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346756</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court held that the Special Leave Petitions became academic following the publication of final duty notifications under the Anti-Dumping Rules in 2012. The court did not address the issue of &#039;domestic industry&#039; in Rule 2(b) of the Anti-Dumping Rules, leaving it open for future adjudication. Consequently, all Special Leave Petitions and pending applications were disposed of based on these findings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2017 18:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=486449" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 814 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346756</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court held that the Special Leave Petitions became academic following the publication of final duty notifications under the Anti-Dumping Rules in 2012. The court did not address the issue of &#039;domestic industry&#039; in Rule 2(b) of the Anti-Dumping Rules, leaving it open for future adjudication. Consequently, all Special Leave Petitions and pending applications were disposed of based on these findings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346756</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>