<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 809 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346751</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ petition challenging the rejection of a drawback claim under the Re-export of Imported Goods (Drawback of Customs Duties) Rules, 1995. The petitioner failed to meet the requirements of Rule 5 regarding timely filing and necessary documentation. The court emphasized the need for strict adherence to statutory rules and highlighted the importance of complying with procedural requirements for claiming duty drawbacks. No costs were awarded in this case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Aug 2017 14:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=486444" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 809 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346751</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ petition challenging the rejection of a drawback claim under the Re-export of Imported Goods (Drawback of Customs Duties) Rules, 1995. The petitioner failed to meet the requirements of Rule 5 regarding timely filing and necessary documentation. The court emphasized the need for strict adherence to statutory rules and highlighted the importance of complying with procedural requirements for claiming duty drawbacks. No costs were awarded in this case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346751</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>