https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346750 The court held that a foreign company, incorporated in Nepal, could maintain a writ petition in India for redressal of grievances. The demand notice issued by customs authorities for lost goods in transit was deemed valid under the Treaty of Trade. The court clarified that foreign nationals, including juristic persons, could invoke Article 226 of the Constitution for rights violations, distinguishing between claims under Article 14 and Article 19(1)(g). The judgment upheld the validity of the demand notice and dismissed the petition, ruling that the Indian Government was not liable to compensate the foreign company for theft of goods in transit. en-us Thu, 15 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 23 Aug 2017 07:29:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346750 The court held that a foreign company, incorporated in Nepal, could maintain a writ petition in India for redressal of grievances. The demand notice issued by customs authorities for lost goods in transit was deemed valid under the Treaty of Trade. The court clarified that foreign nationals, including juristic persons, could invoke Article 226 of the Constitution for rights violations, distinguishing between claims under Article 14 and Article 19(1)(g). The judgment upheld the validity of the demand notice and dismissed the petition, ruling that the Indian Government was not liable to compensate the foreign company for theft of goods in transit. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 15 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346750