https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346746 The amended notification dated 01.05.2015 substituted the Schedule to the National Highways Act, 1956 and omitted Visakhapatnam from the NH-16 route description. On that basis, the omitted stretch could no longer be treated as part of NH-16 for applying the 500-metre liquor licence restriction. The clarification stated that a separate de-notification under Section 2(3) was unnecessary where the Schedule itself had been substituted. Accordingly, rejection of the A4 shop and 2-B bar licence applications on the assumption that the premises were within the prohibited highway belt was legally unsustainable, and the applications had to be reconsidered in accordance with law. en-us Tue, 04 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 23 Aug 2017 07:23:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346746 The amended notification dated 01.05.2015 substituted the Schedule to the National Highways Act, 1956 and omitted Visakhapatnam from the NH-16 route description. On that basis, the omitted stretch could no longer be treated as part of NH-16 for applying the 500-metre liquor licence restriction. The clarification stated that a separate de-notification under Section 2(3) was unnecessary where the Schedule itself had been substituted. Accordingly, rejection of the A4 shop and 2-B bar licence applications on the assumption that the premises were within the prohibited highway belt was legally unsustainable, and the applications had to be reconsidered in accordance with law. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 04 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346746