<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 802 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346744</link>
    <description>The National Company Law Tribunal affirmed its orders dismissing review applications challenging compounding fees imposed under Section 441 of the Companies Act, 2013. The Tribunal clarified that its jurisdiction does not extend to reviewing its own orders, except for rectifying mistakes apparent from the record within two years. The appellant&#039;s reliance on Tribunal rules for rectification was deemed inapplicable, as the case did not involve clerical errors. The Tribunal upheld its original orders, emphasizing the finality under the Companies Act due to the lapse of the appeal period, ultimately dismissing the appeals without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Aug 2017 07:21:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=486437" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 802 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346744</link>
      <description>The National Company Law Tribunal affirmed its orders dismissing review applications challenging compounding fees imposed under Section 441 of the Companies Act, 2013. The Tribunal clarified that its jurisdiction does not extend to reviewing its own orders, except for rectifying mistakes apparent from the record within two years. The appellant&#039;s reliance on Tribunal rules for rectification was deemed inapplicable, as the case did not involve clerical errors. The Tribunal upheld its original orders, emphasizing the finality under the Companies Act due to the lapse of the appeal period, ultimately dismissing the appeals without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346744</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>