https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346740 The Tribunal upheld the Adjudicating Authority's order confirming the provisional attachment of Vishal House, dismissing the appeal. The appellant was allowed to retain possession of the property but required to deposit Rs. 25,000 monthly with the respondent until the final disposal of proceedings under the PMLA, with the deposit's fate contingent on the trial's outcome. en-us Tue, 20 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 23 Aug 2017 07:19:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346740 The Tribunal upheld the Adjudicating Authority's order confirming the provisional attachment of Vishal House, dismissing the appeal. The appellant was allowed to retain possession of the property but required to deposit Rs. 25,000 monthly with the respondent until the final disposal of proceedings under the PMLA, with the deposit's fate contingent on the trial's outcome. Case-Laws Money Laundering Tue, 20 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346740