https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193915 The court held that the indefinite blacklisting of the petitioner by GAIL (India) Limited was excessively harsh and disproportionate. The court set aside the blacklisting order and remanded the matter to GAIL to reconsider the period of blacklisting, aligning it with the integrity pact's specified period of six months to three years. The court emphasized the need for a balanced approach in punitive measures, considering the adverse impact on the petitioner's business and employees. en-us Fri, 06 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 22 Aug 2017 18:51:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193915 The court held that the indefinite blacklisting of the petitioner by GAIL (India) Limited was excessively harsh and disproportionate. The court set aside the blacklisting order and remanded the matter to GAIL to reconsider the period of blacklisting, aligning it with the integrity pact's specified period of six months to three years. The court emphasized the need for a balanced approach in punitive measures, considering the adverse impact on the petitioner's business and employees. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 06 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193915