<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (10) TMI 57 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9618</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the Revenue, holding that the assessee was obligated to file a statement of advance tax under section 209A(1). Failure to do so justified the levy of interest under section 217. The court emphasized the absolute obligation to file a statement if the current income exceeded the specified amount and upheld the application of commercial principles to the requirement of paying interest. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was deemed erroneous by the court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 09:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=48640" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (10) TMI 57 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9618</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the Revenue, holding that the assessee was obligated to file a statement of advance tax under section 209A(1). Failure to do so justified the levy of interest under section 217. The court emphasized the absolute obligation to file a statement if the current income exceeded the specified amount and upheld the application of commercial principles to the requirement of paying interest. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was deemed erroneous by the court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9618</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>