https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193919 The High Court upheld the statutory Export Obligation but allowed extensions for genuine hardships, emphasizing the importance of timely exports. The Court limited its interference in the Policy Relaxation Committee's decisions unless legal errors were evident. It dismissed some writ petitions, set aside the Denied Entities List orders, and granted the petitioner an opportunity to contest them. The case underscored the necessity of compliance with Export Obligations, the Committee's discretion in granting relief, and the restricted judicial review scope in such cases. en-us Mon, 05 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 22 Aug 2017 18:51:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193919 The High Court upheld the statutory Export Obligation but allowed extensions for genuine hardships, emphasizing the importance of timely exports. The Court limited its interference in the Policy Relaxation Committee's decisions unless legal errors were evident. It dismissed some writ petitions, set aside the Denied Entities List orders, and granted the petitioner an opportunity to contest them. The case underscored the necessity of compliance with Export Obligations, the Committee's discretion in granting relief, and the restricted judicial review scope in such cases. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 05 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193919