<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 1351 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193920</link>
    <description>The Court allowed the petition, quashing ongoing criminal proceedings related to fraudulent property transfers under registered conveyance documents. It held that criminal charges were premature without prior Civil Court findings establishing fraudulence, emphasizing the necessity for Civil Court adjudication before pursuing criminal charges.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2017 18:51:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=486398" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 1351 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193920</link>
      <description>The Court allowed the petition, quashing ongoing criminal proceedings related to fraudulent property transfers under registered conveyance documents. It held that criminal charges were premature without prior Civil Court findings establishing fraudulence, emphasizing the necessity for Civil Court adjudication before pursuing criminal charges.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193920</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>