<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 1421 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193933</link>
    <description>The Tribunal overturned the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, ruling that payments for internet connectivity charges do not constitute technical services under Section 194J, thus TDS was not required. Similarly, the Tribunal held that TDS was not necessary on payments for computer software purchases as they did not qualify as technical services under Section 194J. The appeal was partly allowed, with interest calculation under Section 201(1A) becoming academic in light of these decisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2017 18:51:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=486385" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 1421 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193933</link>
      <description>The Tribunal overturned the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, ruling that payments for internet connectivity charges do not constitute technical services under Section 194J, thus TDS was not required. Similarly, the Tribunal held that TDS was not necessary on payments for computer software purchases as they did not qualify as technical services under Section 194J. The appeal was partly allowed, with interest calculation under Section 201(1A) becoming academic in light of these decisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193933</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>