https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193906 The court dismissed the writ petition, directing the Revenue to conclude adjudication proceedings within three months. It upheld the necessity of full and true disclosure in settlement applications, emphasizing that the Settlement Commission's role is not adjudicatory but aimed at settlement based on such disclosure. The court held that the rejection order by the Settlement Commission cannot be interfered with under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India, citing precedents supporting non-interference unless statutory provisions are violated. en-us Fri, 30 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 22 Aug 2017 18:14:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193906 The court dismissed the writ petition, directing the Revenue to conclude adjudication proceedings within three months. It upheld the necessity of full and true disclosure in settlement applications, emphasizing that the Settlement Commission's role is not adjudicatory but aimed at settlement based on such disclosure. The court held that the rejection order by the Settlement Commission cannot be interfered with under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India, citing precedents supporting non-interference unless statutory provisions are violated. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 30 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193906