https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193903 The court dismissed the petition on grounds that the petitioner had locus standi, suppressed facts, delayed filing, and failed to prove allegations of non-appointment, alteration of share capital, illegal director appointments, denial of inspection, and siphoning of funds. The court found the petitioner's claims unsubstantiated and lacking merit, leading to the dismissal of the petition without costs. en-us Wed, 04 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 22 Aug 2017 17:20:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193903 The court dismissed the petition on grounds that the petitioner had locus standi, suppressed facts, delayed filing, and failed to prove allegations of non-appointment, alteration of share capital, illegal director appointments, denial of inspection, and siphoning of funds. The court found the petitioner's claims unsubstantiated and lacking merit, leading to the dismissal of the petition without costs. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 04 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193903