<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (6) TMI 515 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193901</link>
    <description>The court justified the reduction of capital due to the company&#039;s financial struggles post-9/11, aiming to reflect an accurate financial position. The court required publication of notices for transparency, with the petitioner undertaking to seek court permission for future borrowing. This decision aimed to protect creditors&#039; interests and ensure fairness among shareholders, with the court scheduling a hearing for objections and further review.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 17 Jun 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2017 16:43:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=486353" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (6) TMI 515 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193901</link>
      <description>The court justified the reduction of capital due to the company&#039;s financial struggles post-9/11, aiming to reflect an accurate financial position. The court required publication of notices for transparency, with the petitioner undertaking to seek court permission for future borrowing. This decision aimed to protect creditors&#039; interests and ensure fairness among shareholders, with the court scheduling a hearing for objections and further review.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 17 Jun 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193901</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>