https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193896 Withdrawal of an earlier suit bars a later suit only where both concern the same subject-matter; overlapping issues alone do not trigger the bar under Order 23 Rule 1(3) or Order 2 Rule 2, and withdrawal without a merits adjudication does not create res judicata. A company may enforce a share lien through sale only by strictly meeting the articles' conditions, including a presently payable liability, accurate written demand and notice of intended sale. Defective authority of officers cannot validate the sale. A purchaser with notice of irregularity cannot claim bona fide purchaser or indoor-management protection, and an unsupported registration may be rectified. en-us Mon, 03 Mar 1958 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 22 Aug 2017 13:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193896 Withdrawal of an earlier suit bars a later suit only where both concern the same subject-matter; overlapping issues alone do not trigger the bar under Order 23 Rule 1(3) or Order 2 Rule 2, and withdrawal without a merits adjudication does not create res judicata. A company may enforce a share lien through sale only by strictly meeting the articles' conditions, including a presently payable liability, accurate written demand and notice of intended sale. Defective authority of officers cannot validate the sale. A purchaser with notice of irregularity cannot claim bona fide purchaser or indoor-management protection, and an unsupported registration may be rectified. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 03 Mar 1958 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193896