https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346739 The Court declined the writ petition challenging the orders of the ACST and Commissioner (Appeals-I) regarding the Petitioner's claim of refund of service tax. However, the Court directed the CESTAT to address both the limitation aspect and the merits of the claim without remanding the matter, emphasizing expeditious disposal due to the history of prolonged litigation. The writ petition and pending application were dismissed, with instructions for the CESTAT to decide on both issues without further remand. en-us Thu, 17 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 12 Feb 2018 17:35:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346739 The Court declined the writ petition challenging the orders of the ACST and Commissioner (Appeals-I) regarding the Petitioner's claim of refund of service tax. However, the Court directed the CESTAT to address both the limitation aspect and the merits of the claim without remanding the matter, emphasizing expeditious disposal due to the history of prolonged litigation. The writ petition and pending application were dismissed, with instructions for the CESTAT to decide on both issues without further remand. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 17 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346739