<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 788 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346730</link>
    <description>Delay in filing the central excise appeals was condoned, and the appeals were admitted by the Supreme Court. The order is procedural and does not record any substantive determination on the excise dispute or the merits of the parties&#039; legal positions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2017 07:30:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=486301" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 788 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346730</link>
      <description>Delay in filing the central excise appeals was condoned, and the appeals were admitted by the Supreme Court. The order is procedural and does not record any substantive determination on the excise dispute or the merits of the parties&#039; legal positions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346730</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>