<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 787 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346729</link>
    <description>The appeal was rendered academic because the Tribunal decision relied upon by the appellant had already been affirmed by the SC in an earlier appeal. With that binding precedent in place, the Court found no live controversy or substantive issue left for adjudication and declined to examine the merits. The appeal was therefore dismissed, as there was no basis to disturb the prior conclusion.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2017 12:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=486300" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 787 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346729</link>
      <description>The appeal was rendered academic because the Tribunal decision relied upon by the appellant had already been affirmed by the SC in an earlier appeal. With that binding precedent in place, the Court found no live controversy or substantive issue left for adjudication and declined to examine the merits. The appeal was therefore dismissed, as there was no basis to disturb the prior conclusion.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346729</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>