<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 782 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346724</link>
    <description>Steel items such as channels, joists, plates, angles and TMT bars used to fabricate the structural support of machinery employed in manufacturing were treated as qualifying for CENVAT credit. Applying the user test and reading Rule 2(a)(A) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 as pari materia with the earlier capital goods definition, the Tribunal held that materials used to create an integral part of machinery, namely its supporting structure, fall within capital goods for credit purposes. The contrary view in Vandana Global Ltd. was regarded as no longer good law after later Supreme Court authority, and the denial of credit was held unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2017 07:30:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=486295" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 782 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346724</link>
      <description>Steel items such as channels, joists, plates, angles and TMT bars used to fabricate the structural support of machinery employed in manufacturing were treated as qualifying for CENVAT credit. Applying the user test and reading Rule 2(a)(A) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 as pari materia with the earlier capital goods definition, the Tribunal held that materials used to create an integral part of machinery, namely its supporting structure, fall within capital goods for credit purposes. The contrary view in Vandana Global Ltd. was regarded as no longer good law after later Supreme Court authority, and the denial of credit was held unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346724</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>