<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 776 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346718</link>
    <description>Printing instructions and particulars on buyer-supplied paper, followed by cutting, folding and creasing into paper wallets, did not amount to manufacture because mere printing did not bring about a new product. The paper wallets were treated as printed paper articles classifiable under Chapter Sub-Heading 4901.90, not Chapter Sub-Heading 4823.90, in line with Chapter Note 11 of Chapter 48. On that basis, the central excise duty demand was unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2017 07:30:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=486289" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 776 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346718</link>
      <description>Printing instructions and particulars on buyer-supplied paper, followed by cutting, folding and creasing into paper wallets, did not amount to manufacture because mere printing did not bring about a new product. The paper wallets were treated as printed paper articles classifiable under Chapter Sub-Heading 4901.90, not Chapter Sub-Heading 4823.90, in line with Chapter Note 11 of Chapter 48. On that basis, the central excise duty demand was unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346718</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>