<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 774 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346716</link>
    <description>Clearances made for export through a merchant exporter could not be denied SSI exemption under Notification No. 9/2003-C.E. because the concession was framed for clearances for home consumption up to the specified aggregate value, and the disputed goods were not cleared for home consumption. On the facts found, the Revenue&#039;s demand for differential duty was not sustainable, and the Tribunal also noted revenue neutrality. The denial of SSI exemption was therefore unjustified and the demand failed in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2017 07:30:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=486277" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 774 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346716</link>
      <description>Clearances made for export through a merchant exporter could not be denied SSI exemption under Notification No. 9/2003-C.E. because the concession was framed for clearances for home consumption up to the specified aggregate value, and the disputed goods were not cleared for home consumption. On the facts found, the Revenue&#039;s demand for differential duty was not sustainable, and the Tribunal also noted revenue neutrality. The denial of SSI exemption was therefore unjustified and the demand failed in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346716</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>