<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 762 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346704</link>
    <description>The Court clarified that the VATO (Audit) had jurisdiction to pass assessment orders under the Delhi Value Added Tax Act, 2004. The Appellant&#039;s challenge regarding the audit&#039;s authority to make assessments was rejected, emphasizing the Act&#039;s specific provisions allowing for delegation of audit powers. The Court upheld the validity of the assessment orders issued by the VATO and dismissed the appeal, ruling in favor of the Department without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2018 10:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=486265" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 762 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346704</link>
      <description>The Court clarified that the VATO (Audit) had jurisdiction to pass assessment orders under the Delhi Value Added Tax Act, 2004. The Appellant&#039;s challenge regarding the audit&#039;s authority to make assessments was rejected, emphasizing the Act&#039;s specific provisions allowing for delegation of audit powers. The Court upheld the validity of the assessment orders issued by the VATO and dismissed the appeal, ruling in favor of the Department without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346704</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>