<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 760 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346702</link>
    <description>The Court found in favor of the petitioner, holding that the Check Post Official erred in determining the nature of the sale as local without proper consideration of supporting documents. The Court directed the release of the goods and advised any remaining doubts to be referred to the jurisdictional Assessing Officer. The writ petition was allowed, impugned proceedings set aside, and no costs were awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2017 21:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=486263" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 760 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346702</link>
      <description>The Court found in favor of the petitioner, holding that the Check Post Official erred in determining the nature of the sale as local without proper consideration of supporting documents. The Court directed the release of the goods and advised any remaining doubts to be referred to the jurisdictional Assessing Officer. The writ petition was allowed, impugned proceedings set aside, and no costs were awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346702</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>