<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 748 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346690</link>
    <description>The ITAT partially allowed the appeal, directing the AO to tax only the profit element on alleged bogus purchases and to verify the reconciliation filed by the appellant regarding differences in credit balances. The ITAT stressed the need for further evidence and thorough verification in assessing such matters, aiming for fairness and accuracy in determining the appellant&#039;s taxable income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2017 06:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=486251" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 748 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346690</link>
      <description>The ITAT partially allowed the appeal, directing the AO to tax only the profit element on alleged bogus purchases and to verify the reconciliation filed by the appellant regarding differences in credit balances. The ITAT stressed the need for further evidence and thorough verification in assessing such matters, aiming for fairness and accuracy in determining the appellant&#039;s taxable income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346690</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>