<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 743 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346685</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal overturned the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, in favor of the appellant. The Tribunal found that the penalty was based on an estimated profit element lacking concrete evidence, leading to the decision to quash the penalty. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) had reduced the addition to a mere estimation of the profit element, which the Tribunal deemed insufficient to sustain the penalty. As a result, the penalty imposed by the Assessing Officer was revoked, and the appeal of the assessee was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2017 07:27:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=486246" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 743 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346685</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal overturned the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, in favor of the appellant. The Tribunal found that the penalty was based on an estimated profit element lacking concrete evidence, leading to the decision to quash the penalty. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) had reduced the addition to a mere estimation of the profit element, which the Tribunal deemed insufficient to sustain the penalty. As a result, the penalty imposed by the Assessing Officer was revoked, and the appeal of the assessee was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346685</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>