<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 740 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346682</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, setting aside the CIT(A)&#039;s orders on the issues of applicability of Sections 194J and 194I to the payments made to M/s. Avery Dennisson Hong Kong BV, M/s. Sify Ltd., and Tracom Network Ltd. The Tribunal also ruled that the service tax component in the payments to M/s. Sify Ltd. should not be subject to TDS.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2022 15:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=486243" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 740 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346682</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, setting aside the CIT(A)&#039;s orders on the issues of applicability of Sections 194J and 194I to the payments made to M/s. Avery Dennisson Hong Kong BV, M/s. Sify Ltd., and Tracom Network Ltd. The Tribunal also ruled that the service tax component in the payments to M/s. Sify Ltd. should not be subject to TDS.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346682</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>