<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (8) TMI 63 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9602</link>
    <description>The court quashed the notices for reopening completed assessments beyond four years as the reasons recorded did not demonstrate failure to disclose material facts. The court held that the conditions for reopening were not met, ruling the notices without jurisdiction and allowing the petition while making the rule absolute with no costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 19:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=48624" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (8) TMI 63 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9602</link>
      <description>The court quashed the notices for reopening completed assessments beyond four years as the reasons recorded did not demonstrate failure to disclose material facts. The court held that the conditions for reopening were not met, ruling the notices without jurisdiction and allowing the petition while making the rule absolute with no costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9602</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>