https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193877 A maintainability objection to the winding-up order could not be reopened in later Official Liquidator proceedings because the earlier orders had not been challenged and had attained finality. The company court was also entitled to disregard an unregistered and insufficiently stamped lease deed, as it was inadmissible in evidence and the surrounding circumstances suggested the arrangement was not bona fide. In liquidation, the court had jurisdiction to determine questions concerning the company's property and possession, and to direct delivery of the premises to the Official Liquidator. The appeal therefore failed and the possession order was upheld. en-us Tue, 31 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 21 Aug 2017 21:07:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193877 A maintainability objection to the winding-up order could not be reopened in later Official Liquidator proceedings because the earlier orders had not been challenged and had attained finality. The company court was also entitled to disregard an unregistered and insufficiently stamped lease deed, as it was inadmissible in evidence and the surrounding circumstances suggested the arrangement was not bona fide. In liquidation, the court had jurisdiction to determine questions concerning the company's property and possession, and to direct delivery of the premises to the Official Liquidator. The appeal therefore failed and the possession order was upheld. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 31 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193877