https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193883 A petitioner permitted to withdraw a challenge to the constitutional validity of the Customs Act provision retained liberty to challenge the Order-in-Original separately. The clarification confirms that this liberty did not exclude recourse to a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, notwithstanding available statutory appellate remedies. Whether to entertain such a writ petition, or require pursuit of the statutory remedy under the Customs Act, remains within the discretion of the competent court. The application was disposed of on that basis, preserving access to judicial review of the administrative order. en-us Wed, 14 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 21 Aug 2017 21:07:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193883 A petitioner permitted to withdraw a challenge to the constitutional validity of the Customs Act provision retained liberty to challenge the Order-in-Original separately. The clarification confirms that this liberty did not exclude recourse to a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, notwithstanding available statutory appellate remedies. Whether to entertain such a writ petition, or require pursuit of the statutory remedy under the Customs Act, remains within the discretion of the competent court. The application was disposed of on that basis, preserving access to judicial review of the administrative order. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 14 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193883