<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 1420 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193888</link>
    <description>Penalty under section 271E for alleged violation of section 269T was held unsustainable where the Tribunal found that the transactions were genuine, transparent, and routed only through bank accounts without any cash or hidden dealings. On those factual findings, the foundation for the penalty did not survive, and the deletion of the penalty was upheld in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2017 21:07:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=486221" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 1420 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193888</link>
      <description>Penalty under section 271E for alleged violation of section 269T was held unsustainable where the Tribunal found that the transactions were genuine, transparent, and routed only through bank accounts without any cash or hidden dealings. On those factual findings, the foundation for the penalty did not survive, and the deletion of the penalty was upheld in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193888</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>