https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193872 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Chennai, dismissed the condonation of delay motion and the appeal due to insufficient reasons provided by the appellant for the delay in filing. The tribunal found the appellant's explanations regarding financial constraints and health issues to be vague and unreasonable, ultimately citing the N. Balakrishnan Vs. M. Krishnamurthy case to emphasize the significance of the delay's length in determining the appeal's timeliness. en-us Thu, 06 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 21 Aug 2017 21:07:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193872 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Chennai, dismissed the condonation of delay motion and the appeal due to insufficient reasons provided by the appellant for the delay in filing. The tribunal found the appellant's explanations regarding financial constraints and health issues to be vague and unreasonable, ultimately citing the N. Balakrishnan Vs. M. Krishnamurthy case to emphasize the significance of the delay's length in determining the appeal's timeliness. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 06 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193872