<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 1086 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193874</link>
    <description>The tribunal partly allowed the appeals, setting aside the impugned orders dated 8-9-2016. It directed the respondent to supply the relevant documents and statements to the appellants, ensuring compliance with the principles of natural justice and procedural fairness. The tribunal emphasized the importance of providing a fair opportunity for the accused to defend themselves in the adjudication process under the PMLA.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2017 21:07:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=486216" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 1086 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193874</link>
      <description>The tribunal partly allowed the appeals, setting aside the impugned orders dated 8-9-2016. It directed the respondent to supply the relevant documents and statements to the appellants, ensuring compliance with the principles of natural justice and procedural fairness. The tribunal emphasized the importance of providing a fair opportunity for the accused to defend themselves in the adjudication process under the PMLA.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193874</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>