https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193890 The SC disposed of SLP(C) No. 28115 of 2012 as infructuous because the main dispute had already been decided by the Gauhati High Court, and it also disposed of the connected interlocutory applications. In SLP(C) No. 14778 of 2013, the Court declined to proceed because Company Appeal No. 2 of 2016 was pending before the Gauhati High Court; it dismissed the petition, disposed of the pending interlocutory applications, and expressly kept all questions arising in the pending appeal open. en-us Tue, 29 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 21 Aug 2017 21:07:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193890 The SC disposed of SLP(C) No. 28115 of 2012 as infructuous because the main dispute had already been decided by the Gauhati High Court, and it also disposed of the connected interlocutory applications. In SLP(C) No. 14778 of 2013, the Court declined to proceed because Company Appeal No. 2 of 2016 was pending before the Gauhati High Court; it dismissed the petition, disposed of the pending interlocutory applications, and expressly kept all questions arising in the pending appeal open. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 29 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193890