<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 1472 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193891</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court found the appellant&#039;s disqualification from a tender process to be illegal, arbitrary, and perverse. The Court overturned the High Court&#039;s decision, directing the tender process to continue with the appellant&#039;s bid reinstated for further consideration. The Court emphasized that administrative decisions should be reviewed for arbitrariness, unreasonableness, or bias, and found the respondent&#039;s disqualification decision lacking a reasonable basis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2017 21:07:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=486212" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 1472 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193891</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court found the appellant&#039;s disqualification from a tender process to be illegal, arbitrary, and perverse. The Court overturned the High Court&#039;s decision, directing the tender process to continue with the appellant&#039;s bid reinstated for further consideration. The Court emphasized that administrative decisions should be reviewed for arbitrariness, unreasonableness, or bias, and found the respondent&#039;s disqualification decision lacking a reasonable basis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193891</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>