<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (5) TMI 693 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193868</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that the interest expenditure of Rs. 34,92,373/- incurred by the assessee on borrowed funds, used for investments generating exempt dividend income, cannot be deducted under Section 14A of the Income Tax Act. It emphasized that the disallowance applies regardless of actual income earned. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was allowed, vacating the CIT(A)&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2024 14:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=486205" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (5) TMI 693 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193868</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that the interest expenditure of Rs. 34,92,373/- incurred by the assessee on borrowed funds, used for investments generating exempt dividend income, cannot be deducted under Section 14A of the Income Tax Act. It emphasized that the disallowance applies regardless of actual income earned. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was allowed, vacating the CIT(A)&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193868</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>