<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Promissory Estoppel in CST Refunds: Balancing State Financial Interests and Executive Authority in Fraud Prevention.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=36000</link>
    <description>Principle of Promissory Estoppel - grant of refund on CST paid - Undoubtedly, fraudulent refund claims obtained, would be contrary to the financial interests of the State, thereby affecting the larger public interest. The policy wisdom of the State that the grant of refund was eroding non-plan resources is a matter exclusively in the executive domain. - SC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2017 17:21:14 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2017 17:21:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=486184" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Promissory Estoppel in CST Refunds: Balancing State Financial Interests and Executive Authority in Fraud Prevention.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=36000</link>
      <description>Principle of Promissory Estoppel - grant of refund on CST paid - Undoubtedly, fraudulent refund claims obtained, would be contrary to the financial interests of the State, thereby affecting the larger public interest. The policy wisdom of the State that the grant of refund was eroding non-plan resources is a matter exclusively in the executive domain. - SC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2017 17:21:14 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=36000</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>