https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193865 Property under a court-appointed Receiver remains in custodia legis, so a revenue auction conducted without notice to the Receiver or leave of the appointing court was treated as illegal for purposes of the suit and could not defeat the Receiver's protected possession. The Berar Land Revenue Code, 1928 did not bar a civil action seeking declaration that the sale did not affect such property and consequential possession, because the dispute was not confined to the Code's sale-setting-aside grounds and was outside matters the revenue authorities were empowered to determine. en-us Mon, 31 Mar 1958 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 21 Aug 2017 17:15:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193865 Property under a court-appointed Receiver remains in custodia legis, so a revenue auction conducted without notice to the Receiver or leave of the appointing court was treated as illegal for purposes of the suit and could not defeat the Receiver's protected possession. The Berar Land Revenue Code, 1928 did not bar a civil action seeking declaration that the sale did not affect such property and consequential possession, because the dispute was not confined to the Code's sale-setting-aside grounds and was outside matters the revenue authorities were empowered to determine. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 31 Mar 1958 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193865