<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (9) TMI 1106 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193864</link>
    <description>The appeal filed by the revenue and the cross objection filed by the assessee were partly allowed. The deletion of VSAT charges was upheld as they were reimbursements without an income element. However, the issue of transaction charges was remanded to the AO for verification following guidelines from the Bombay High Court. The addition under section 14A was reinstated as the assessee did not contest it.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2017 17:08:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=486181" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (9) TMI 1106 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193864</link>
      <description>The appeal filed by the revenue and the cross objection filed by the assessee were partly allowed. The deletion of VSAT charges was upheld as they were reimbursements without an income element. However, the issue of transaction charges was remanded to the AO for verification following guidelines from the Bombay High Court. The addition under section 14A was reinstated as the assessee did not contest it.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193864</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>