<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (9) TMI 1153 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193861</link>
    <description>Before taking possession of forfeited property under SAFEMA, the competent authority must first determine whether the occupant is a person to whom the Act applies under Section 2, because the possession-taking power presupposes lawful application of the statute. Where the occupant asserts an independent tenancy, the authority must also issue a proper show-cause notice and conduct an enquiry into tenancy rights before ordering eviction. A vague notice and failure to hear the occupant on the tenancy claim render the eviction unsustainable. The matter was remitted for a fresh determination of the occupant&#039;s legal status and, only if covered by the Act, further action in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2017 16:31:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=486174" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (9) TMI 1153 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193861</link>
      <description>Before taking possession of forfeited property under SAFEMA, the competent authority must first determine whether the occupant is a person to whom the Act applies under Section 2, because the possession-taking power presupposes lawful application of the statute. Where the occupant asserts an independent tenancy, the authority must also issue a proper show-cause notice and conduct an enquiry into tenancy rights before ordering eviction. A vague notice and failure to hear the occupant on the tenancy claim render the eviction unsustainable. The matter was remitted for a fresh determination of the occupant&#039;s legal status and, only if covered by the Act, further action in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193861</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>