<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Upholds Penalty for Cash Transaction Violation u/s 269-SS of Income Tax Act.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=35994</link>
    <description>Penalty u/s 273-D - violation of Section 269-SS - The contention that the said entries are not in the nature of the loan or deposit on the face of it are not acceptable for the reason that once any amount has been received by the assessee and the same is shown to have been received in its books of accounts, it partakes the nature of the deposit - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2017 11:00:03 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2017 11:00:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=486131" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Upholds Penalty for Cash Transaction Violation u/s 269-SS of Income Tax Act.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=35994</link>
      <description>Penalty u/s 273-D - violation of Section 269-SS - The contention that the said entries are not in the nature of the loan or deposit on the face of it are not acceptable for the reason that once any amount has been received by the assessee and the same is shown to have been received in its books of accounts, it partakes the nature of the deposit - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2017 11:00:03 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=35994</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>