<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (12) TMI 1266 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193848</link>
    <description>A winding-up petition based on the company&#039;s inability to pay debts was made absolute where the petition had already been admitted and advertised, no affidavit in reply was filed, the company remained absent, and nothing was shown to justify departing from the earlier order. Compliance with the publication requirement was noted, and the court ordered the company to be wound up in favour of the petitioner with costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2017 10:36:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=486127" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (12) TMI 1266 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193848</link>
      <description>A winding-up petition based on the company&#039;s inability to pay debts was made absolute where the petition had already been admitted and advertised, no affidavit in reply was filed, the company remained absent, and nothing was shown to justify departing from the earlier order. Compliance with the publication requirement was noted, and the court ordered the company to be wound up in favour of the petitioner with costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193848</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>