https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193839 In a technically specialised tender, the owner's interpretation of the qualifying requirement for drilling and related operational experience was given deference because the owner was best placed to assess the bid conditions and supporting material. Judicial review was confined to whether the evaluation process was mala fide, arbitrary, irrational, or contrary to public interest; on the facts stated, the owner's view was found consistent with the tender framework and technical evaluation process. The bidder's challenge to the finding of technical non-responsiveness was therefore not accepted. en-us Tue, 18 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 21 Sep 2017 18:44:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193839 In a technically specialised tender, the owner's interpretation of the qualifying requirement for drilling and related operational experience was given deference because the owner was best placed to assess the bid conditions and supporting material. Judicial review was confined to whether the evaluation process was mala fide, arbitrary, irrational, or contrary to public interest; on the facts stated, the owner's view was found consistent with the tender framework and technical evaluation process. The bidder's challenge to the finding of technical non-responsiveness was therefore not accepted. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 18 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193839