<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 1471 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193842</link>
    <description>The Tribunal addressed the stay granted by the Madras High Court on insolvency proceedings, interpreting Sections 14 and 238 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. It noted the moratorium under Section 14 and the Code&#039;s supremacy over other laws. The Tribunal directed the appellant to justify the appeal&#039;s continuation despite the existing stay order, with a future hearing planned for parties to address the stay order and relevant Code provisions&#039; applicability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2018 12:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=486114" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 1471 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193842</link>
      <description>The Tribunal addressed the stay granted by the Madras High Court on insolvency proceedings, interpreting Sections 14 and 238 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. It noted the moratorium under Section 14 and the Code&#039;s supremacy over other laws. The Tribunal directed the appellant to justify the appeal&#039;s continuation despite the existing stay order, with a future hearing planned for parties to address the stay order and relevant Code provisions&#039; applicability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193842</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>