<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 1080 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193828</link>
    <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal against the rejection of refund claims related to Cenvat credit under the DFIA Scheme was dismissed by the Tribunal. The Tribunal held that the principle of unjust enrichment does not apply to Cenvat credit refunds as per the relevant provisions of Sec. 11B, 2(c). The decision clarified the specific application of the law in this context, emphasizing that the incidence of duty should not have been passed on to another person for the refund to be granted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2017 08:10:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=486112" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 1080 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193828</link>
      <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal against the rejection of refund claims related to Cenvat credit under the DFIA Scheme was dismissed by the Tribunal. The Tribunal held that the principle of unjust enrichment does not apply to Cenvat credit refunds as per the relevant provisions of Sec. 11B, 2(c). The decision clarified the specific application of the law in this context, emphasizing that the incidence of duty should not have been passed on to another person for the refund to be granted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193828</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>