<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 709 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346651</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled that leasing ATMs did not fall under Banking and Other Financial Services for the period from 16.8.2002 to 31.10.2004. It was held that ATM-related services were specifically included in financial services only from 1.5.2006 onwards. Therefore, the demand for service tax on ATM services under Banking and Other Financial Services was deemed unsustainable, leading to the appeal being allowed with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2017 08:09:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=486078" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 709 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346651</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled that leasing ATMs did not fall under Banking and Other Financial Services for the period from 16.8.2002 to 31.10.2004. It was held that ATM-related services were specifically included in financial services only from 1.5.2006 onwards. Therefore, the demand for service tax on ATM services under Banking and Other Financial Services was deemed unsustainable, leading to the appeal being allowed with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346651</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>