<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 707 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346649</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the department&#039;s stay applications regarding the Order-in-Appeal granting refund claims under Rule 5 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. It affirmed the eligibility of the assessee for refund/credit on input services prior to 01.04.2011, including services like Outward Catering, Rent-a-Cab, Parking Charges, Air Travel Agency, Restaurant, and Photography Services. The Tribunal also upheld the credit availed on invoices for unregistered premises, citing settled legal principles and previous decisions. Despite the department&#039;s delay in granting the refund, the Tribunal dismissed the stay applications, directing the cases for regular hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2017 08:09:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=486076" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 707 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346649</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the department&#039;s stay applications regarding the Order-in-Appeal granting refund claims under Rule 5 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. It affirmed the eligibility of the assessee for refund/credit on input services prior to 01.04.2011, including services like Outward Catering, Rent-a-Cab, Parking Charges, Air Travel Agency, Restaurant, and Photography Services. The Tribunal also upheld the credit availed on invoices for unregistered premises, citing settled legal principles and previous decisions. Despite the department&#039;s delay in granting the refund, the Tribunal dismissed the stay applications, directing the cases for regular hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346649</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>