<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 705 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346647</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal, except for &#039;outdoor catering service,&#039; holding that services like repair and maintenance of machinery were directly related to the manufacture of final products and eligible for CENVAT credit under Rule 2(l) of CCR, 2004. The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, emphasizing the appellant&#039;s entitlement to credit for services essential for manufacturing finished goods as per regulatory requirements.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2017 08:09:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=486074" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 705 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346647</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal, except for &#039;outdoor catering service,&#039; holding that services like repair and maintenance of machinery were directly related to the manufacture of final products and eligible for CENVAT credit under Rule 2(l) of CCR, 2004. The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, emphasizing the appellant&#039;s entitlement to credit for services essential for manufacturing finished goods as per regulatory requirements.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346647</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>