https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346642 The Tribunal set aside the duty demand against the appellants in an appeal concerning alleged clandestine removal of goods. The adjudicating authority failed to prove the charges with tangible evidence and proper establishment of illicit activities, as required by guidelines. Insufficient evidence and lack of inquiry at the appellant's manufacturing unit led to the reversal of the duty demand, providing consequential relief to the appellants. en-us Wed, 16 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 21 Sep 2017 12:10:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346642 The Tribunal set aside the duty demand against the appellants in an appeal concerning alleged clandestine removal of goods. The adjudicating authority failed to prove the charges with tangible evidence and proper establishment of illicit activities, as required by guidelines. Insufficient evidence and lack of inquiry at the appellant's manufacturing unit led to the reversal of the duty demand, providing consequential relief to the appellants. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 16 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346642